Dougie’s Election 3
Dougie on UNION TERRACE GARDENS
I met an old mate the other day
Hadn’t seen him for ages
We talked about this and that
And, of course, the other
We got round to Union Terrace Gardens
My mate is an alternative kind of guy
And I just assumed
(Careful with assumptions)
That he’d been a No voter in the referendum
Not at all
He’d voted Yes
Puzzled, I asked
Why?
‘Union Terrace is totally run down’
Quo he
‘Something’s got to be done about it,
It’s a crumbling bit of Victoriana’
My answer was that ALL are agreed
That something should be done
That all sides of the debate begin
With ‘something must be done’
But why the Ian Wood plan?
But I’ve got to take my hat off to the Yes campaign
(I voted No by the way)
They managed
(whether purposefully I don’t know)
To present the debate as
(1) The Ian Wood Plan
Or
(2) Leaving it as it is
Brilliant
Of course
The whole thing isn’t over
We remain a city divided
The Alice in Wonderland economics of TIF funding
Might still vanish down the rabbit hole
And there may well be a surprise or two
Down the road
Not least the result of the local elections!
But one thing the No campaign has to do
Is gain some ground
On the ’something must be done’ front
Save UTG is proactive not passive, of course it means doing something with the Gardens. Certainly the campaign to save UTG should've emphasised more the Gardens potential rather than focussing on saying NO! What should be remembered is the save UTG campaign was staffed by volunteer amatuers as opposed to the slcik professionals associated with the raving ranter Ian Wood!
ReplyDelete